Free Will Philosophy Essay

I strongly believe that W.T. Stace is aline while arguing for the view of soft determinism, also known as compatibilism. Stace believes in compatibilism, which states that determinism is true, but impoverished pull up stakes still does constitute. He lays both views together by studying the definition of promiscuous will. Stace asks, How can any single be punished or rewarded for his or her actions if they be in possession of no control all over their actions? That statement seemed extremely convincing to me because both dHolbach and Chisholm supported whizz side of the argument.dHolbach and Chisholm argued that we are either strictly determined by the laws of nature and physical science or that we are not determined, rather world we have the power to do as we choose. Stace on the other hand, put both positions together and made them work together. He explained that the laws of nature and physics do have an impact on our choices, but we do have the ability to choose what w e require to choose when making a decision. immaterial forces may push on our decision, but we are the ones responsible for choosing what we want to choose. He persuasively defends his view of soft determinism by explaining the definition of free will. He states, In order for one to define free will, one must look into how the phrase is commonly used. The way a philosopher interprets free will is different than the way a common soul will do so.Stace defines free acts as acts that are directly caused by a persons internal thoughts or desires coming directly from the person. non free acts are those that have outside forces pushing a person to do something a certain way such as a threat or harm. This was very different from what other philosophers have stated in the past. By providing examples of free will, Stace points out that free will clearly does exist. It wouldnt make sense for free will not to exist since it is compatible with determinism.